Frequently asked questions

A space for clinical reasoning. It helps organise information, examine hypotheses that need assessment, and connect the work to notes and follow-up. The clinician remains at the centre.

No. Suggested hypotheses are lines of inquiry, not established diagnoses or calibrated clinical probabilities.

No. AI may be wrong or incomplete. The clinician checks the information, corrects or discards suggestions, and retains every clinical and documentation decision.

Invited psychologists, psychotherapists, psychiatrists and other mental-health professionals testing the product with entirely fictional cases.

Yes. Participation in this private Beta is free; this says nothing about the price of a possible future service.

Use your invitation and your own account, read the personal Beta notice, and open the in-app Guide. If AI is blocked, ask the practice administrator about the AI policy.

No. Only entirely fictional cases are allowed. Do not enter real patients' information, notes, emails, messages, recordings or transcripts.

No. Removing names, using codes, changing identities or obtaining consent does not make a real case eligible. Material derived from a real clinical case is also excluded.

A history, identity and appointment invented from scratch, with no link to a real person or clinical story. Apply the same rule to screenshots and feedback.

The personal Beta notice and the practice AI policy are separate checks. AI requests stay blocked until a practice administrator activates the current policy; account permissions also apply.

A confirmation in Privacy Center that the practice will use AI in this Beta only with fictional cases under professional responsibility. Only a practice administrator can activate or revoke it. It does not permit real data.

Possibilities to assess against information supplied and checked by the clinician. They may highlight missing information and questions; they are not diagnoses.

It critically revisits the reasoning and may highlight weak, incomplete or unsupported points. It does not automatically validate a hypothesis.

It broadens the comparison with alternatives, perspectives and areas for further inquiry. It does not rule out unlisted conditions.

Informational support with cards available for some hypotheses. It does not validate a diagnosis or replace professional sources and judgement.

Selected material prepares a draft in the note. Check the linked case, review and edit the text, then save explicitly and reopen the note to verify it.

No. Transfer neither confirms the content nor replaces professional review, and it is not the same as saving the note.

Writing assistance reached from a clinical note via the «Copilot» button in its AI support area. In this Beta it is not promoted as a standalone menu or Dashboard feature.

On request it imports relevant material already in the note into editable context: history, summary, reasoning and notes; where present, a selected hypothesis, missing information, questions, risk signals and alerts to verify. Nothing is sent to AI automatically.

Yes. Read and edit the context before explicitly generating; then review, correct or discard the draft. You decide whether to transfer and save it in the note.

Do not accept it by default. Compare it with the case, correct or discard it, and report the issue using an invented example only.

No. Synaris is not an emergency service and does not replace appropriate care pathways.

Email adminsynaris@gmail.com with the page, action, expected and observed result, browser and device. Do not send passwords, tokens or real patient data.

Email adminsynaris@gmail.com: tell us what helps, what is confusing, what interrupts your reasoning and what is missing. Use wholly fictional content and screenshots only.